```xml <result> <column_name>coverage</column_name> <family>additive</family> <subtype>intensive_additive</subtype> <confidence>0.85</confidence> <requires_user_confirmation>false</requires_user_confirmation> <sum_meaningful>false</sum_meaningful> <signed>false</signed> <reducers> <primary_reducer>mean</primary_reducer> <valid_reducers>mean, min, max, median, distribution</valid_reducers> <excluded_reducers>sum (summing a proportion/coverage level is meaningless), product (not a ratio)</excluded_reducers> <average_semantics>arithmetic_mean</average_semantics> </reducers> <inner_outer_measure> <inner_measure_reducer>min</inner_measure_reducer> <outer_measure_reducer>max</outer_measure_reducer> </inner_outer_measure> <multiplicative_partner_derivable>false</multiplicative_partner_derivable> <reasoning> Gate prior: DIMENSION table with no sequence axis makes multiplicative highly implausible. The column name "coverage" indicates a proportion or percentage (bounded [0,1]), which is an intensive level measure. The data confirms this: bounded [0.0, 1.0], mean 0.755, median 0.926, with 17.7% zeros representing "no coverage". This is a snapshot intensity level at each entity, not an extensive quantity that accumulates. Summing coverage values across entities is meaningless; averaging them is the natural rollup operation. Classified as intensive_additive with high confidence. </reasoning> <table_type_conflict>false</table_type_conflict> </result> ```