```xml <result> <column_name>CLTV</column_name> <family>additive</family> <subtype>intensive_additive</subtype> <confidence>0.85</confidence> <requires_user_confirmation>false</requires_user_confirmation> <sum_meaningful>false</sum_meaningful> <signed>false</signed> <reducers> <primary_reducer>mean</primary_reducer> <valid_reducers>mean, min, max, median, distribution</valid_reducers> <excluded_reducers>sum (summing a level/score is meaningless), product (not a ratio)</excluded_reducers> <average_semantics>arithmetic_mean</average_semantics> </reducers> <inner_outer_measure> <inner_measure_reducer>min</inner_measure_reducer> <outer_measure_reducer>max</outer_measure_reducer> </inner_outer_measure> <multiplicative_partner_derivable>false</multiplicative_partner_derivable> <reasoning> DIMENSION table with no sequence axis strongly priors against multiplicative. CLTV (Customer Lifetime Value) is typically an absolute monetary value or score, not a ratio. The range [2003, 6500] with no center near 1.0 rules out ratio_multiplicative. The values appear to be absolute levels/scores where averaging is meaningful but summing is not (you don't "add up" customer lifetime values to get a meaningful total). Classified as intensive_additive: an absolute level that should be averaged, not summed, when aggregating across customers. </reasoning> <table_type_conflict>false</table_type_conflict> </result> ```