PHPMem v2.0.1
Version
1.6.45
Uptime
15 days 8 hours 17 minutes 38 seconds
Memory
Total
512MB
Used
24,01MB (4.69%)
Free
487,99MB
Keys
Current
27 650
Total (since start)
33 978
Evictions
0
Reclaimed
160
Expired Unfetched
0
Evicted Unfetched
0
Connections
Current
11 / 1 024 max
Total
170 014
Rejected
0
llm:aef773862b50eeb96ec0340d9f62a2008fcbf9019e420ed11aee2d8a69cd1b11
Edit
**The most important metric is `petal_length`.** It separates the three species better than any other measure here.
**Why petal length**
- The per-species ranges (from the `iris_by_species` gold table) show setosa's petal lengths run 1.0–1.9, with a mean of 1.46.
- Versicolor runs 3.0–5.1 (mean 4.26), and virginica runs 4.5–6.9 (mean 5.55).
- Setosa has no overlap with the other two species, because its maximum of 1.9 is below versicolor's minimum of 3.0.
- Versicolor and virginica overlap only in a narrow band of 4.5–5.1.
- Sepal width is the weakest separator. Its species means sit within about 0.65 of each other, and its ranges overlap heavily (setosa 2.3–4.4, versicolor 2.0–3.4, virginica 2.2–3.8).
- This pick rests on the ranges and means alone. I did not run a formal feature-importance test, and petal width looks nearly as discriminating.
**Highest and lowest records by petal length**
- **Highest:** a virginica specimen with petal length 6.9, petal width 2.3, sepal length 7.7 and sepal width 2.6.
- **Lowest:** a setosa specimen with petal length 1.0, petal width 0.2, sepal length 4.6 and sepal width 3.6.
The two extremes come from opposite species. They also differ far more in petal length (6.9 vs 1.0) than in sepal width (2.6 vs 3.6). This is why petal length is a strong feature for classifying new specimens.