PHPMem v2.0.1
Version
1.6.45
Uptime
18 days 9 hours 59 minutes 11 seconds
Memory
Total
512MB
Used
12,33MB (2.41%)
Free
499,67MB
Keys
Current
13 424
Total (since start)
40 994
Evictions
0
Reclaimed
762
Expired Unfetched
0
Evicted Unfetched
0
Connections
Current
2 / 1 024 max
Total
245 899
Rejected
0
llm:a0aa1555d704332fe5839a72513e73204117c8ca5bdf6ab60c81faa211cad03e
Edit
**The two strongest relationships are bounce rate with exit rate (r ≈ 0.79) and page views with entrances (r ≈ 0.79). Everything else is weak or close to zero.** I computed Pearson correlations across all 15 pairs of the five numeric measures plus average time on page, using all 62,496 rows (step 1 and step 2).
**Strong relationships**
- **Bounce rate and exit rate (0.788).** Pages with a high bounce rate also tend to have a high exit rate. The two metrics are related by definition, since a bounce is a single-page session that ends on its entry page. Treat them as largely one signal rather than two independent problems.
- **Page views and entrances (0.786).** Pages that get many views also tend to be the pages people land on. Traffic is driven by entry pages, which supports prioritising entry-page optimisation.
**Weak relationships**
- **Unique views and entrances (0.378).**
- **Page views and unique views (0.332).** I expected these to be much closer, so the weak link is surprising. It may mean a few very high-volume pages dominate one measure but not the other, or that unique views are counted differently across sites. I did not check this.
**Essentially unrelated (|r| < 0.08)**
- **Average time on page** is uncorrelated with every other measure. Its closest links are exit rate (−0.071) and bounce rate (−0.045), both negligible. Time spent on a page does not predict whether visitors leave.
- **Bounce and exit rates** are also uncorrelated with the volume measures (page views, unique views, entrances), with values between about −0.012 and 0.
- In other words, page popularity says nothing about whether a page retains visitors.
**Caveats**
- These are Pearson (linear) correlations on page-level rows. Traffic counts are usually heavy-tailed, so a few very large pages could be inflating or masking some of these values. A rank-based (Spearman) correlation would be a useful check.
- I only tested numeric columns. I did not measure how strongly WEBSITE or YEAR relate to the metrics, and differences between sites could be a bigger driver of bounce and exit rates than any pair above.