{
    "action": "tool_call",
    "reasoning": "I've found several patterns so far: higher-ranked fighters win 94.7% of the time, physical advantages (height/reach) correlate strongly with wins, and fighters who lost had worse prior records. These are all intuitive. To find something truly counterintuitive, I should look for anomalies or patterns that defy expectations. Let me examine the cases where lower-ranked fighters actually won, or where physical disadvantages didn't matter. I'll also check if there are any unexpected patterns in fight endings, age effects, or stance matchups that contradict conventional wisdom.",
    "tool": "query_sql",
    "args": {
        "sql": "SELECT f_boxer, s_boxer, f_boxer_result, f_boxer_ranking, s_boxer_ranking, f_boxer_age, s_boxer_age, f_boxer_height, s_boxer_height, f_boxer_reach, s_boxer_reach, fightEnd FROM raw.cleandata WHERE f_boxer_ranking > s_boxer_ranking AND f_boxer_result = 'won' ORDER BY (f_boxer_ranking - s_boxer_ranking) DESC LIMIT 20",
        "purpose": "Find cases where the lower-ranked fighter (higher number = worse rank) actually won, to identify upsets",
        "source": "raw"
    }
}