PHPMem v2.0.1
Version
1.6.45
Uptime
15 days 9 hours 56 minutes 41 seconds
Memory
Total
512MB
Used
24,01MB (4.69%)
Free
487,99MB
Keys
Current
27 650
Total (since start)
33 978
Evictions
0
Reclaimed
160
Expired Unfetched
0
Evicted Unfetched
0
Connections
Current
12 / 1 024 max
Total
170 858
Rejected
0
llm:9041d57ba2d01bd06b28f8303b184fbbf41df384b9743ef3a8ac021358caf8ec
Edit
{
"judgments": [
{
"dependent": "ProductStyle",
"decision": "rescue",
"confidence": 0.78,
"reason_code": "single_row_typo",
"reason_refers_to": null,
"rationale": "One row of five in \"ML Mountain Frame-W\" carries style \"U\" against four \"W\"; the model name itself designates the women's frame, so the lone U reads as a bad value, not a second correct style.",
"request_escalation": false,
"claims": {
"repetition": "repeated_owners",
"population": "measured_eligible_rows",
"collision": {
"direction": "forward",
"columns": [
"ProductStyle"
],
"conflicting_values": [
"W",
"U"
],
"evidence_refs": [
"violating_groups",
"measured_shape.forward_violations"
],
"basis": "observed_in_evidence"
},
"scope_claim": null,
"evidence_refs": [
"candidate",
"violating_groups",
"measured_shape",
"other_columns_in_this_table"
]
},
"scope": {
"owning_determinant": [
"ModelName"
],
"interpretation": "entity_property",
"population": "all_eligible_rows",
"conditions": [],
"basis": "This is a product lookup dimension: one row per ProductKey, with size and colour variants of a model sharing that model's design attributes. A style code (men's/women's/unisex) belongs to the model as designed, and the brief lists no date, snapshot or effective-dating column this table could be versioning styles against, so the single dissenting row is a bad value rather than a second valid style. The disagreement sits entirely in one of 37 repeated models (concentration 1.0, p95 fanout 1), which is the shape of an isolated defect.",
"evidence": [
"other_columns_in_this_table",
"measured_shape.counts",
"measured_shape.forward_violations",
"paired_values"
]
}
}
]
}