<result> <column_name>vRk</column_name> <family>additive</family> <subtype>ordinal_additive</subtype> <confidence>0.6</confidence> <requires_user_confirmation>false</requires_user_confirmation> <sum_meaningful>false</sum_meaningful> <signed>false</signed> <reducers> <primary_reducer>sum</primary_reducer> <valid_reducers>sum, mean, min, max, median, last, rank, normalized_mean</valid_reducers> <excluded_reducers>product (not a ratio), geomean (not a ratio)</excluded_reducers> <average_semantics>arithmetic_mean</average_semantics> </reducers> <inner_outer_measure> <inner_measure_reducer>sum</inner_measure_reducer> <outer_measure_reducer>sum</outer_measure_reducer> </inner_outer_measure> <multiplicative_partner_derivable>true</multiplicative_partner_derivable> <reasoning> The table is PATH with a Date sequence axis, so the full analysis applies. The name "vRk" suggests a rank (for example a volume rank), and the data fit: positive integer-like values from 1 to 2252, a low distinct fraction, and a median of 273. The center is far from 1.0, and the column has no ratio naming or unit, so multiplicative is ruled out. The log_symmetry_gain is moderate, but it is expected for a right-skewed rank and does not outweigh the other evidence. Rank is only ordinal along the sequence, so I chose ordinal_additive. Confidence is moderate because the name is ambiguous and there are no reconstruction signals. Summing ranks is not meaningful in a true extensive sense, so sum_meaningful is false. </reasoning> <table_type_conflict>false</table_type_conflict> </result>