```xml <result> <column_name>Power Capacity (MW)</column_name> <family>additive</family> <subtype>intensive_additive</subtype> <confidence>0.85</confidence> <requires_user_confirmation>false</requires_user_confirmation> <sum_meaningful>false</sum_meaningful> <signed>false</signed> <reducers> <primary_reducer>mean</primary_reducer> <valid_reducers>mean, min, max, median, distribution</valid_reducers> <excluded_reducers>sum (summing capacity across entities is meaningless without volume context), product (not a ratio)</excluded_reducers> <average_semantics>arithmetic_mean</average_semantics> </reducers> <inner_outer_measure> <inner_measure_reducer>min</inner_measure_reducer> <outer_measure_reducer>max</outer_measure_reducer> </inner_outer_measure> <multiplicative_partner_derivable>false</multiplicative_partner_derivable> <reasoning> Table type is DIMENSION with no sequence axis, making multiplicative highly implausible. The column name "Power Capacity (MW)" indicates an intensive physical property (capacity level) with explicit physical units (megawatts), not an extensive quantity that accumulates. Values range from 0.11 to 352.35 MW with no zeros or negatives, representing absolute capacity levels at entity grain. Summing capacities across independent entities is meaningless (you cannot add the capacity of Plant A to Plant B to get a combined capacity without knowing their operational relationship), making this intensive_additive rather than real_additive. The primary reducer is mean for aggregating capacity levels across a portfolio or region. </reasoning> <table_type_conflict>false</table_type_conflict> </result> ```