PHPMem v2.0.1

Version
1.6.45
Uptime
7 days 3 hours 53 minutes

Memory

Total
512MB
Used
13,32MB (2.6%)
Free
498,68MB

Keys

Current
10 162
Total (since start)
11 092
Evictions
0
Reclaimed
157
Expired Unfetched
0
Evicted Unfetched
0

Connections

Current
4 / 1 024 max
Total
57 910
Rejected
0
llm:6fa3c7a06ae71d33e14be75d03bfc29378448f71498739d6b77e1374cc0d55a8
TTL 12 hours 33 minutes 40 seconds Size 2,17KB Export
Edit
{"action": "think", "reasoning": "I need to identify the most surprising or counterintuitive finding in this AI benchmarks dataset. Looking at the evidence so far:\n\n1. Step-3 shows parameter scaling trends - larger models generally perform better, but the improvement is modest and non-linear\n2. Step-5 shows clear temporal improvement - 2026 models average 0.533 vs 2023's 0.172\n3. Step-7 is the most striking: it shows cases where SMALLER models significantly outperform LARGER models\n\nThe step-7 results are remarkable: Gemma 4 31B IT (31 billion parameters) consistently outperforms models that are 50-77x larger:\n- Beats Qwen3.8 Max (2.4 trillion params, 77x larger) by up to 0.468 points\n- Beats DeepSeek v4 Pro (1.6 trillion params, 52x larger) by up to 0.733 points \n- Beats Grok 4.5 (1.5 trillion params, 48x larger) by up to 0.514 points\n\nThis directly contradicts the conventional wisdom that 'bigger is better' in AI. The smaller model achieves scores around 0.73-0.76 while trillion-parameter models score as low as 0.02-0.47 on the same tasks.\n\nThis is the most counterintuitive finding because:\n1. It violates the scaling laws that have driven AI development\n2. The magnitude is extreme (50-77x parameter difference)\n3. It's consistent across multiple large model families\n4. It suggests efficiency gains matter more than raw scale\n\nI should verify this is about the same benchmark/task to ensure it's a fair comparison, and check if there are other explanations (like different publication dates suggesting algorithmic improvements)."} {"action": "query_sql", "sql": "SELECT 'Gemma 4 31B IT' as model, Parameters as params, \"Best score (across scorers)\" as score, \"Model task\" as task, \"Publication date\" as pub_date, original_task_name FROM raw.epoch_ai_benchmarks WHERE \"Display name\" = 'Gemma 4 31B IT' AND \"Best score (across scorers)\" BETWEEN 0.73 AND 0.76 ORDER BY score DESC LIMIT 10", "purpose": "Get the specific benchmark tasks where Gemma 4 31B IT achieved its high scores (0.73-0.76) to verify what it excelled at", "source": "raw"}