### 5.1 Performance Posture The Iris table (150 rows) is comfortably within the range where storage layout and query speed are not a concern. With completeness at 100% and only one table in scope, there is no cross-table movement to slow analysis, and the largest-table share of 100% simply reflects that everything lives in a single place. No scaling pressure is visible in the evidence, and we see no basis for tuning at this size. ### 5.2 Key Optimizations | Priority | Table | Recommendation | |---|---|---| | None | Iris | No optimization recommended at current data scale | No high-priority items were identified, so there is no performance spend to justify today. Any tuning at 150 rows would add complexity without a measurable benefit to analysis turnaround. The more useful planning question is how the Iris table might grow, for example through additional records or enrichment columns. Performance should be revisited if that volume increases materially.