PHPMem v2.0.1

Version
1.6.45
Uptime
7 days 12 hours 25 minutes 6 seconds

Memory

Total
512MB
Used
13,33MB (2.6%)
Free
498,67MB

Keys

Current
10 164
Total (since start)
11 094
Evictions
0
Reclaimed
157
Expired Unfetched
0
Evicted Unfetched
0

Connections

Current
3 / 1 024 max
Total
67 866
Rejected
0
llm:12947a5c0f69994e56231fbb982eb0bae2040cf1ec6c32e626814e01a309fab7
TTL 3 days 6 hours 38 minutes 59 seconds Size 1,70KB Export
Edit
### 5.1 Performance Posture The **table_tennis_sept2022** table operates at a scale (7,851 rows) well within the performance envelope of modern data platforms, requiring no immediate infrastructure intervention. As a single-table dataset with 100% of records concentrated in one structure, query performance is inherently straightforward—no join overhead, no cross-table latency, and minimal indexing complexity. The current architecture supports responsive analytics for typical business intelligence queries (player rankings, match outcomes, tournament summaries) without bottlenecks, though the flat schema limits the sophistication of relational queries that might emerge as analytical needs mature. ### 5.2 Key Optimizations **No high-priority optimizations recommended at current data scale.** At 7,851 rows, this dataset does not exhibit performance stress signals that would justify index tuning, partitioning, or compute upgrades. The absence of optimization recommendations reflects infrastructure readiness rather than neglect—the table performs adequately for its size and expected query patterns (filtering by player, date range, or tournament). As the dataset grows beyond 50,000 rows or if real-time leaderboard queries become mission-critical, revisit indexing strategies on frequently filtered columns (player identifiers, match dates, tournament codes). For now, infrastructure investment should prioritize **schema enrichment**—adding dimension tables for players, tournaments, or rankings—over performance tuning, as the current bottleneck is analytical depth, not query speed.