```xml <result> <column_name>Calculated Power Capacity (MW)</column_name> <family>additive</family> <subtype>intensive_additive</subtype> <confidence>0.85</confidence> <requires_user_confirmation>false</requires_user_confirmation> <sum_meaningful>false</sum_meaningful> <signed>false</signed> <reducers> <primary_reducer>mean</primary_reducer> <valid_reducers>mean, min, max, median, distribution</valid_reducers> <excluded_reducers>sum (summing capacity levels across entities is meaningless without volume context), product (not a ratio)</excluded_reducers> <average_semantics>arithmetic_mean</average_semantics> </reducers> <inner_outer_measure> <inner_measure_reducer>min</inner_measure_reducer> <outer_measure_reducer>max</outer_measure_reducer> </inner_outer_measure> <multiplicative_partner_derivable>false</multiplicative_partner_derivable> <reasoning> Table type is DIMENSION with no sequence axis, making multiplicative highly implausible. The column name "Calculated Power Capacity (MW)" indicates an intensive physical property—a capacity level measured in megawatts. The values (0.11 to 352.35 MW) are absolute magnitudes far from both 0 and 1, with no zeros or negatives, consistent with a physical capacity rating. On a DIMENSION table, capacity is a characteristic level of each entity; summing capacities across unrelated entities is meaningless (you cannot add the capacity of plant A to plant B to get a meaningful total), but averaging, min, and max are sensible aggregations. This is clearly intensive_additive. </reasoning> <table_type_conflict>false</table_type_conflict> </result> ```